Reconsidering social cohesion: Definition and analytical framework

Key facts

Joseph Chan, Ho-pong To, Elaine Chan
Geographical focus
Main elements of social cohesion
Identity/feeling of belonging
Dimensions of social cohesion
Horizontal dimension (between individuals/groups)
Vertical dimension (between individuals or groups and institutions)



Social cohesion is a state of affairs concerning both the vertical and the horizontal interactions among members of society as characterised by a set of attitudes and norms that includes trust, a sense of belonging and the willingness to participate and help, as well as their behavioural manifestations.


Our definition has the following features:

It is close to the ordinary usage. It concerns how well people in a society ‘‘cohere’’ or ‘‘stick’’ to each other.  People in a society are said to be ‘‘sticking’’ to each other only if the following three criteria are simultaneously met:

  1.  they can trust, help and cooperate with their fellow members of society;
  2. they share a common identity or a sense of belonging to their society;
  3. the subjective feelings in (1) and (2) are manifested in objective behaviour. 


It is a minimalist one. It includes only the essential constituents, not causes or effects, of social cohesion.  The latter must not be be included in the definition of social cohesion, otherwise there is no way to empirically test claims about the causes and effects of social cohesion. "Social cohesion" should not be a ‘‘catchword’’ for incorporating the most pressing social issues of the day.

It is different from "social capital." "Social capital" focuses primarily on the individual and group levels, like the networks maintained by each individual and the personal benefits that flow from them. "Social cohesion," on the other hand, is more holistic and is concerned mainly with the general condition of society.

It bears no logical relationship with any systems of ideology. One may well envisage that social cohesion in an eighteenth-century agricultural society may depend more on values like ‘‘hierarchy’’ and ‘‘respect for tradition’’. Today, it may well be the case that liberal values, for example, are indeed particularly conducive to social cohesion in modern capitalist societies. This, however, is an entirely empirical question and therefore should not be included in the very definition of the term.

Social cohesion is one of the many values. It may indeed be in conflict with other values or goods, such as diversity, pluralism and creativity. Depending on culture and other socioeconomic factors, different societies may have different preferences as to how much social cohesion they would like to maintain. Recognition of this point is crucial, as it is the first step towards a normative analysis of when or under what conditions it is morally justified to trade off social cohesion with other values or goods.

graph_concept_The University of Hong Kong

Explore the hub further

graph_concept_Reconsidering social cohesion: Definition and analytical framework

Reconsidering social cohesion: Definition and analytical framework

graph_data_Social Cohesion in Asia: What holds Asian Societies together?

Social Cohesion in Asia: What holds Asian Societies together?

graph_publication_Conflict-sensitive cash transfers: social cohesion

Conflict-sensitive cash transfers: social cohesion

image_project_Sport for Development Resource Toolkit

Sport for Development Resource Toolkit