HomeLibraryPublication

Is it ethnic fractionalization or social exclusion, which affects social cohesion?

Irene van Staveren & Zahid Pervaiz (2017)

Key facts

Journal/Publisher
Social Indicators Research
Type of publication
Journal article
Elements of social cohesion
Intergroup relations
Equality/Inequality
Connectedness
Geographical focus
Empirical
Main thematic areas
Economic development
Inequality

Summary

The theory about missing links of economic growth often lags behind the empirical estimations of such links. A consensus has emerged that ethnic fractionalization has a negative impact on growth, also when controlled for income inequality. Often, although implicitly, the assumed channel is social cohesion. We analyse the effect of fractionalization on social cohesion with a different inequality measure, namely a social measure of inequality: the Inclusion of Minorities Index. Our results indicate that it is social exclusion, which reduces social cohesion, rather than diversity as such. We conclude that future studies of social cohesion and its relation to growth may benefit from using measures of social exclusion next to ethnic diversity.

Publication_2017_Irene van Staveren & Zahid Pervaiz

Explore the hub further

UNDP Conceptual Framework of Social Cohesion
Concept

UNDP Conceptual Framework of Social Cohesion

graph_data_SCORE Ukraine & SCORE Eastern Ukraine
Data

SCORE Ukraine & SCORE Eastern Ukraine

graph_publication_The Effect of Social Cohesion on Subjective Individual Quality of Life in European Countries
Library

The Effect of Social Cohesion on Subjective Individual Quality of Life in European Countries

image_project_Support to Strengthening Resilience in North-East Nigeria
Project

Support to Strengthening Resilience in North-East Nigeria